Elon Musk Signs Letter Urging Military To Cancel Military Robots

world news  %tages Elon Musk Signs Letter Urging Military To Cancel Military Robots Just as patrons are keenly hoping for driverless cars, Tesla CEO Elon Musk and hundreds of other leaders are urging military researchers to be careful what they wish for.
Not quite predicting the day that Skynet becomes self aware, Musk, Stephen Hawking and hundreds of others are urging them to stop development of autonomous artificial intelligence weapons.
The call for the worldwide ban is intended as a poignant weep now that more than unintended consequences, the consequnces of terrorists getting these weapons within years are predictable and inevitable, and beyond doubt not excellent
This is according to an open letter revealed Monday at the International Joint www.rawvehicle.com Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Buenos Aires.
Disparate benign driverless cars to convey passengers, the types of self-guided, thought machines openly feared are ones that can target public and do them at will without human guidance or risk to a human operator.
“Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has reached a point where the deployment of such systems is — practically if not legally — feasible within years, not decades, and the stakes are high: autonomous weapons have been described as the third revolution in warfare, after concentrate and nuclear arms,” says the letter.

Other signatories include Steve Wozniak, co-founder of Apple; Noam Chomsky, linguist and biased philosopher; and Demis Hassabis, chief executive of the artificial intelligence company Google DeepMind, reports www.rawvehicle.com the New York Times.
Their voices are speaking up now with concern. Far simpler than nuclear weapons, AI weapons could be made on a financial statement and with limited resources; affordable to mass produce by any military, and in due time by terrorists and other terrible operators.
“If any major military power pushes ahead with AI weapon development, a global arms race is virtually inevitable, and the endpoint of this technological curve is obvious: autonomous weapons will become the Kalashnikovs of tomorrow,” says the letter. “It will only be a matter of time until they grow on the black market and in the hands of terrorists, dictators wishing to better control their populace, warlords wishing to perpetrate ethnic cleansing, etc.”
www.rawvehicle.com As human beings develop ever more effective means of butchery, machines that pose no risk to the operator being un-manned should be avoided, not disparate how biological weapons are because the potential is too dire.
“Just as most chemists and biologists have no interest in building compound or biological weapons, most AI researchers have no interest in building AI weapons — and do not want others to tarnish their field by doing so, potentially making a major public backlash against AI that curtails its future societal benefits,” says the letter.
Elon Musk has also said artififial intelligence itself has frightening posssibilitiues, and has called it the “largest existential threat” to humanity.

Autonomous Weapons: an Open Letter from AI & www.rawvehicle.com Robotics Researchers
Autonomous weapons select and engage targets without human intervention. They might include, for example, armed quadcopters that can search for and eliminate public meeting certain pre-defined criteria, but do not include cruise missiles or remotely piloted drones for which humans make all targeting decisions. Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has reached a point where the deployment of such systems is — practically if not legally — feasible within years, not decades, and the stakes are high: autonomous weapons have been described as the third revolution in warfare, after concentrate and nuclear arms.
Many arguments have been made for and against autonomous weapons, for example that replacing human soldiers by machines is excellent by reducing casualties for the owner but www.rawvehicle.com terrible by thereby lowering the threshold for going to battle. The key inquiry for humanity today is whether to start a global AI arms race or to prevent it from starting. If any major military power pushes ahead with AI weapon development, a global arms race is virtually inevitable, and the endpoint of this technological curve is obvious: autonomous weapons will become the Kalashnikovs of tomorrow. Disparate nuclear weapons, they require no costly or hard-to-obtain raw materials, so they will become ubiquitous and cheap for all significant military powers to mass-produce. It will only be a matter of time until they grow on the black market and in the hands of terrorists, dictators wishing to better control their populace, warlords www.rawvehicle.com wishing to perpetrate ethnic cleansing, etc. Autonomous weapons are ultimate for tasks such as assassinations, destabilizing nations, subduing populations and selectively butchery a particular ethnic assemble. We therefore believe that a military AI arms race would not be beneficial for humanity. There are many ways in which AI can make battlefields safer for humans, especially civilians, without making new tools for butchery public.
Just as most chemists and biologists have no interest in building compound or biological weapons, most AI researchers have no interest in building AI weapons — and do not want others to tarnish their field by doing so, potentially making a major public backlash against AI that curtails its future societal benefits. Indeed, chemists and biologists have www.rawvehicle.com broadly supported international agreements that have successfully prohibited compound and biological weapons, just as most physicists supported the treaties banning space-based nuclear weapons and blinding laser weapons.
In outline, we believe that AI has fantastic potential to benefit humanity in many ways, and that the goal of the field should be to do so. Starting a military AI arms race is a terrible thought, and should be prevented by a ban on offensive autonomous weapons beyond consequential human control.
New York Times


We were also found by phrases:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


4 − three =

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>