A new request from Detroit’s major automakers questions for carbon emissions credits from technology such as reflecting solar rays, which may help save fuel.
The reasoning behind the requests is that technologies such as solar reflexive paint and active seat ventilation keep vehicles cooler, which taxes the air conditioner less. This, in turns, saves fuel.
The specific technologies included in the proposal differ from one carmaker to the next. General Motors, for example, wants its efficient Denso air conditioner compressor to count. Fiat Chrysler is asking for credits for reflexive paint, reflexive schooner and seat ventilation.
The third petitioner, Ford, also wants high-efficiency exterior lights, engine www.rawvehicle.com and transmission warmers and grille shutters that boost aerodynamics to count, saying these components also reduce fuel consumption.
These types of technologies are classified as “off-cycle credits” because their fuel savings cannot be measured using the EPA’s standard tailpipe emissions tests.
For Marge Oge, a former EPA executive and a key figure in drafting the 2025 emissions standards, off-cycle requests like these show that automakers are using creative approaches to saving fuel and lowering emissions.
“That’s the whole point of what we tried to establish,” said Oge. “We wanted companies to invest in and develop these technologies.”
Roland Hwang, director of the energy and transportation program for the Natural Resources Defense Council agrees with the approach, but only if it www.rawvehicle.com yields real-world results.
“It’s not just in this area downsizing and turbo-charging. There are all of these fascinating technologies that you may not reckon in this area but are really gas-reducing technologies,” he said.
SEE ALSO: Reaching 2025 CAFE Standards Will Be Simpler Than Predicted
The technologies in this request, which are waiting on approval from the EPA, average an emission savings of 1.5 grams of CO2 per mile for cars, and 2.3 grams for trucks. Though this seems trivial against the EPA’s estimated 411 grams for the average passenger vehicle, automakers are looking anywhere they can for gains in peacefulness to meet the strict emissions guidelines.
The current around of requests isn’t the first time automakers have questioned for www.rawvehicle.com CARB credits from non-powertrain components. Last Development, automotive lobby assemble Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers proposed that automakers receive credits for autonomous technology. Specifically, the assemble’s CEO Mitch Bainwol listed collision warnings, automated braking and adaptive cruise control.
“New safety systems are fuel economy game-changers, because fewer crashes mean less congestion, less fuel use, and fewer carbon emissions,” said Bainwol.